🏴‍☠️ ⚡️ Build Pipeline Where It Hurts: A Modern Approach to TAM Ingestion

Join us every Saturday morning for value creation playbooks, operating concepts, deal analysis and diligence frameworks, and more...

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

1. The Old Playbook: Fit-First, Funnel-Led, Static

2. The Modern Model: Fit + Pain + Signal

3. Priority is a Function of Pain

4. Progress is a Function of High-Priority Engagement

5. Operationalizing a Pain-Driven TAM Engine

6. Final Thought: Fit Gets You Reach. Pain Gets You Results.

---

📺 WATCH:

📻 LISTEN:

---

Most teams treat TAM as a strategy slide—something to impress investors, not guide execution.

They segment by firmographics, enrich with data, assign ICP scores, and sequence en masse. But without observable urgency, they’re just lighting up inboxes and hoping for the best.

Modern GTM teams operate differently. They prioritize accounts not just by fit, but by pain—and they measure progress based on how those accounts respond. Not volume. Not coverage. Movement.

This post is a blueprint for a modern, high-leverage approach to TAM ingestion. Built for operators who want velocity over vanity.

---

The Old Playbook: Fit-First, Funnel-Led, Static

Legacy TAM strategy followed a predictable arc:

• Pull a list of “good fit” accounts

• Enrich with firmographic data

• Rank by score

• Push to outbound

It was logical. Structured. Repeatable.

And deeply flawed.

Why? Because not all ICP-fit accounts are equally ready to engage. Fit alone doesn’t signal urgency. It doesn’t tell you where to focus today.

The result? Bloated CRMs. Wasteful campaigns. And SDRs wondering why “good” accounts never reply.

---

The Modern Model: Fit + Pain + Engagement

(here’s a fun interactive version you can play with…)

The best teams today use a three-layer model to turn TAM into pipeline:

1. Fit

• Still the foundation: industry, size, motion, tech stack

• Helps rule accounts in, but not prioritize within the list

2. Observable Pain

• The unlock: external, time-sensitive evidence that a problem exists now

• Examples:

  • A new compliance deadline in their industry

  • A strategic hire they just made

  • A legacy vendor they’re sunsetting

  • Cost pressure from layoffs or efficiency mandates

Pain is what turns a theoretically good prospect into a practically urgent one.

3. Engagement Signal

• Prospective customer visits to your website, demos, email opens, event attendance, etc. indicating curiosity or interest

• Progression from aware > interested > considering > selecting > new customer is the primary means of measurement for GTM progress and execution

---

Priority is a Function of Pain

This is the shift: fit gets you on the list. Observable pain moves you to the top.

Effort should follow urgency—not just potential.

Tiering Framework:

• Tier 1 (Clear, observable pain) → Immediate GTM orchestration

• Tier 2 (Emerging or inferred pain) → Sequenced, light personalization

• Tier 3 (Fit-only, no pain yet) → Nurture and monitor for signal

The goal isn’t to touch everyone—it’s to move the right few quickly.

---

Progress is a Function of High-Priority Engagement

Most teams celebrate activity volume. But volume is vanity.

Real progress means your most painful accounts are leaning in.

• Are Tier 1 accounts moving from Identified → Aware → Engaged → Evaluating?

• Are your outbound replies coming from high-priority targets?

• Is pipeline being sourced from accounts you actually want to win?

📈 If the answer is no, you’re not progressing—you’re just busy.

---

Operationalizing a Pain-Driven TAM Engine

To execute this approach, you need:

• A shared definition of ICP and what constitutes observable pain

• Systems to detect public, behavioral, and contextual signals

• Workflow to push Tier 1 accounts to the right GTM team fast

• Reporting segmented by account tier—not just campaign or channel

💡 Don’t overcomplicate it. You don’t need intent platforms or AI scoring to get started.

Start with:

• Recent hires

• Tech changes

• Pricing updates

• Public statements

Then layer in behavioral signal (site visits, content engagement) to validate interest.

---

Final Thought: Fit Gets You Reach. Pain Gets You Results.

ICP match is table stakes.

Observable pain creates urgency—and urgency drives conversion.

Intent and behavior signal engagement and progress.

Modern TAM ingestion isn’t about who you could help. It’s about knowing who needs help right now, and showing up with relevance.

Ask yourself every week:

• Who’s in pain?

• Are they moving yet?

If you can answer that clearly, you’re not just working a list.

You’re building pipeline on purpose.

---

Hit REPLY and let me know what you found most useful this week (or rock the one-question survey below) — truly eager to hear from you…

And please forward this email to whoever might benefit (or use the link below) 🏴‍☠️ ⚡️

---